Category: Advocis Forum

Basic Personal Amount – Will BPA changes truly provide tax relief

The federal government recently put a key piece of their tax platform in place: an increase in the basic personal amount (BPA). This is expected to lower taxes for close to 20 million of us, and eliminate any federal tax liability for almost 1.1 million Canadians.

To deliver on this promise, the government will increase the BPA to $15,000 by 2023. On the face of it, that’s a nice, round, substantial figure, and no doubt many of us will experience tax savings. Still, to give it some proportionality and context, let’s take a closer look to understand how, when, to whom, and to what extent this will provide tax relief.

DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS

Most non-tax professionals likely don’t pay too much attention to the difference between a tax deduction and a tax credit. Both can reduce a person’s tax bill, but in a very real sense they are applied at opposite ends of the income spectrum.

A deduction reduces the amount on which tax is calculated. Because we have a progressive personal tax system (i.e., higher rates applying to income at higher brackets), a deduction reduces tax exposure at a person’s uppermost or marginal rate.

In terms of tax credits, a non-refundable credit reduces your initially calculated tax due, whereas a refundable credit is more like a subsidy in that it is paid even if you don’t owe tax. In either case, a maximum amount is legislated for a given purpose, against which the appropriate credit rate is applied. With a few exceptions (mainly charitable and political donations), the credit rate most often is at the lowest bracket rate. For federal tax calculations the lowest rate is 15%, but a person’s own income dictates the marginal rate, which may be as much as 33%.

Connecting those dots, a deduction is generally more valuable than a credit.

The most common non-refundable credit is the basic personal amount, sometimes called the basic personal credit.

Either way, it’s referring to the same thing — effectively negating tax on income from zero up to the set level. For instance, when you file your upcoming return for the 2019 taxation year, you’ll claim this credit on your first $12,069 income. At the 15% rate, the value of the credit is $1,810.

While it may seem an obvious point, note that the amount is larger than the credit value, since it is multiplied by the credit rate. Keep this in mind as we turn our attention to the change in the amount, and contemplate the value of that change.

ENHANCED BPA

Over the course of the next four years, the BPA will be bumped beyond its usual inflation indexing until it reaches $15,000 in 2023. The rollout schedule is shown in the first three columns of the table here, reproduced from the Department of Finance backgrounder. The two right-hand columns are my own calculations for the sake of some analysis to follow.

The additional BPA will initially yield $140 in annual tax savings, rising to about $300 in 2023, as featured in official communications. In that last year, the $15,000 amount will equate to a full value for the BPA of $2,250, a 13% improvement over what current indexing would have given.

However, it will be almost four years until early 2024 tax filing when that extra $300 may be claimed. Using the approximate 2% indexing employed by the Department of Finance, that discounts back to about $277 in current dollar value.

To be clear, I’m critiquing, not criticizing; my aim is to couch expectations of the practical implications for individual and household budgets. That last point is especially important, as there are parallel changes to the spousal and eligible dependant amounts, the effect of which will be to double the impact to as much as $600 for families claiming either of those credits.

INCOME CEILING AND TIME HORIZON

Not everyone will enjoy this enhanced BPA. Extra components will be added to the BPA definition to reduce the enhancement as income enters the 29% fourth bracket, until it is eliminated for someone whose income exceeds the 33% top/fifth bracket. For 2020, those thresholds are $150,473 and $214,368. For your curiosity, a $300 loss across this range is a clawback contribution to a marginal effective tax rate of just under 0.5%.

The BPA and brackets will continue to increase each year according to the existing indexation formula, but the BPA enhancement will remain at $15,000 after 2023. This means that the value of the enhancement will continually erode each year thereafter. Using that 2% index factor as a proxy, the BPA would overtake the enhancement by about 2030. Whether this will still be a feature of our tax system a decade from now is anyone’s guess.

Work interrupted – Severance planning options to help you through the emotional shock

Job loss is a risk we all face. Ask the unfortunate people in the oil patch and at General Motors who are experiencing that first-hand right now.

While you may not be able to completely insulate against it happening, you can prepare yourself with financial habits and tax knowledge to weather through it if it does, and emerge sooner and as intact as possible.

Having a bridge fund

As a type of emergency fund, this bridges the household until the primary or sole breadwinner can get back into financial production. Ideally you’d have this in place well beforehand, but even if you don’t, it’s a habit and mindset that will serve you well if you’re beginning to get nervous about your workplace.

Generally, a three-to-six-month cushion is suggested. While this may serve the purpose, make sure it truly reflects your personal job outlook and spending habits. Without dwelling on it too much, ask yourself on an annual basis what your prospects would be if you had to look for work. And on the spending side, understand what goes toward necessaries, discretionary purchases, and luxuries respectively, and how you will place the latter two on hiatus when required.

Job loss in the moment

It’s an emotional shock, but you need to maintain a clear head in a compressed timeline. The decisions you make will have both immediate and long-term effects. Within that, tax is sometimes simply part of calculating what you have no control over, and in other cases it is a critical contributor to those decisions.

Nature of a payout

Without getting into the minutia of how each is calculated, your employer may owe you one or more of the following, all of which are subject to income tax:

  • Severance pay based on length of your employment, when you are let go without any fault on your part
  • Termination pay that is in lieu of providing advance notice of the last day of employment
  • Vacation pay for earned but unused vacation entitlement
  • Lump sum for accrued benefits (e.g., banked sick days) that may be owed to you on departure

Withholding for income tax, Canada Pension Plan, and Employment Insurance will apply if severance pay is in the form of salary continuance. However, if it is paid as a lump sum, only the tax is deducted. As well, if your employer agrees to defer payment over two or more years, that could ease the tax cost if you are in a lower bracket on each receipt.

Benefit continuation and replacement

Losing health and dental insurance can be an extra disruption, especially if you or your family have upcoming appointments. Ask if coverage could be extended for a time to relieve some of the burden.

For life insurance, employers usually allow you to buy replacement coverage without medical underwriting from the current benefits company. That’s especially important if you’re no longer insurable, but otherwise you may be able to reduce cost by shopping the market.

Retirement funds

Transfer to RRSP: When a large payment comes, you can direct some of that amount to your RRSP if you have room. This will protect against income tax, but be sure that you still keep enough cash on-hand to carry you through your expected unemployment time.

Registered pension plan (RPP): Defined contribution plans can generally be transferred to a locked-in RRSP without any tax issues. Defined benefit plans are more complicated, with possibilities ranging from remaining in the plan, beginning the pension immediately, transferring to the plan of a new employer, or commuting into a locked-in RRSP. Your pension administrator will provide you with a package to review, so get out your reading glasses and fine-tooth comb.

Retiring allowance: Extra one-time RRSP room is available on severance pay to a longstanding employee. It is $2,000 for every year you’ve been with the same or related employer before 1996, plus $1,500 for each year before 1989 for which employer contributions to an RPP or deferred profit sharing plan (DPSP) have not vested. Contributions must be to your own RRSP (i.e., not to a spouse), and the room cannot be carried forward.

Recovery to employment

On top of managing your spending, it’s important to keep your debt under control. At a minimum, make the minimum payments to keep your credit in good standing, bearing in mind that potential future employers will likely do a credit check before hiring.

If you are feeling overwhelmed, consult your financial advisor, a credit counselling service, or an insolvency trustee. They can advise on negotiating with creditors, and discuss whether debt consolidation may be appropriate.

Finally, when you do get resituated, understand and keep an eye on any probationary period you may be under. You should continue to operate with your streamlined spending rules until that period has passed, but in time things will normalize to a new routine, with your future back on track.

Magic Number – What are some advisor assumptions on how much to save?

How much do I need to save for retirement? It’s the most common question asked of financial planners.

Of course, the response depends on how much you’ve already set aside, how much you need to live on now, and how much you want to (or must) spend in those later years. That’s the core of financial planning, and there’s a lot of information to be gathered, decisions and assumptions to be made, and calculations to be applied to come up with viable options and sound recommendations — and even then, there is still some degree of uncertainty.

This doesn’t mean that you don’t go to the effort, particularly if you are the financial planner tasked to make those recommendations. The critical step of any plan though, is putting it in motion.

Heuristics – The appeal of simplicity

In the face of what may feel like a laborious and elusive task, people often prefer to use a heuristic, for example “save 10 per cent of your income.” This is also known as the 10 per cent rule. Because it is so simple, it may very well get things moving, which in fairness, is a victory in itself.

Once good saving habits are established and experience gained, adjustments can be made that cater to changing circumstances.

Even so, 10 per cent is just a nice, round, but otherwise arbitrary figure. The aura that surrounds it should not be confused with the principled due diligence that informs good financial planning.

Do you apply it before or after…?

If we’re not careful, the apparent simplicity can be misleading. How you apply it is equally and arguably more important than the rate you choose in the first place. Too little and there’s not enough when you need it. Too much and the budget stress could be overwhelming, perhaps leading you to abandon the initiative you have taken. Consider these key tax issues:

Is the 10 per cent set before or after income tax?

In other words, are you applying it to gross income or net income? As a rough example (which varies by province), the average tax rate at $100,000 is about 25 per cent.

So, do you target $10,000 based on the gross, or about $7,500 based on the net? That could hinge on the mechanics of how you save.

If you pre-calculated $10,000 then you could pre-authorize a proportionate dollar amount from each paycheque/auto-deposit.

If instead you took 10 per cent off each deposit after it is in your account, it would come out to $7,500.

Are you saving with before-tax or after-tax dollars?

As compared to the first question, which was about the amount to save, this is about deductibility. Put in more familiar terms, you could make a deductible RRSP contribution, or a non-deductible TFSA deposit.

While you can get more into the RRSP to begin, eventually that is taxed on withdrawal before you can spend. TFSAs face no further tax. You’ll need to look at tax rates now (known) and in retirement (assumed) to properly compare. If you’re doing some of each, the arithmetic is more challenging.

Pre- or post-payroll?

If you contribute to a workplace group RRSP, your employer will generally reduce its withholding tax, as it knows of this deduction. When you contribute to your own RRSP, the annual withholding will likely exceed your actual tax due, resulting in you receiving a tax refund. While you don’t have to, reinvesting the refund effectively boosts your savings rate.

Canada Pension Plan?

The CPP is a savings program, with a base premium of 4.95 per cent. It is withheld by your employer, so most people wouldn’t notice or think of it as saving, per se. But depending on your response on the preceding questions, it could be quietly baked into your savings rate. And with premiums increasing to 5.95 per cent over the next few years, and an additional four per cent premium on higher income levels after that, it warrants a closer look to make sure it dovetails with your intentions.

Housing and mortgage?

What does housing have to do with it? Well, equity in a house is a type of saving, usually by first saving a down payment then servicing a mortgage. As an owner, you defray some of your future shelter costs, whereas otherwise you would need more savings to pay future rent. Whether this is before, after, or part of your 10 per cent depends on your circumstances, which is why a holistic financial plan should underlie your efforts.