When I was a boy, we had a modest cottage a couple of hours out of the city. Just getting there was an adventure, as my parents piled six kids and a dog into a Datsun 510 — with no air conditioning.
These days, it is not uncommon to have a vacation property in another province or outside the country altogether. Whether that’s a family getaway, a snowbird retreat, or a new Canadian continuing to hold property ‘back home’, our society lives across borders like never before.
With this modern mode of living comes complexity, particularly when it comes to estate and capacity planning.
Wills and estate transfers
Generally a Canadian Will is effective to deal with a person’s real property (real estate) in the home province, and personal property wherever it may be. In order to deal with real estate elsewhere, the Will would have be proven to the satisfaction of the courts/law in that other jurisdiction. While this is not an impossible task, it presents some additional cost, time and potential uncertainty.
With that in mind, it may be desirable to plan ahead by executing a second Will in that other jurisdiction. In so doing, it is crucial that the second Will doesn’t inadvertently revoke the person’s main Will, or otherwise alter distribution. Accordingly, there must be an open dialogue between the lawyers in the two jurisdictions.
Discussions with the foreign lawyer should include gaining an understanding of tax obligations (currently and for the estate), and legal responsibilities of the executor. This may necessitate adjustments in the home Will, or at least some informal guidance. Alternatively, it could lead to naming a distinct second executor, with appropriate allocation of powers and constraints between the two. This knowledge may even affect the owner’s longer term intentions for the property.
Incapacity while owning or being abroad
Arguably, the estate transfer is the easy situation as compared to having to respond to a crisis while an owner is living. While an estate transfer is a property matter, there are both property and personal issues that can come up while a person is living, with attendant greater urgency.
Powers of attorney (POAs) and powers of attorney for personal care (PAPCs) have been a recommended part of the estate planning process for decades now. And while it is usually intended that the power may be exercised wherever the grantor or property may be, challenges can crop up when foreign jurisdictions are involved.
Some jurisdictions require these documents to be executed in a prescribed form, include specific language or otherwise be constrained in some manner that may be at odds with the home jurisdiction’s rules. Even if there are no such formal impediments, there can be delays (and associated costs) as individuals, health care workers and businesses assure themselves of their obligations — perhaps even requiring them to seek their own legal advice before being able to take instructions.
As with Wills, it may be desirable to have parallel documents drawn up in the foreign jurisdiction in order to expedite action at critical times. In addition to the provisos about guarding against revocation and having open communications, some further questions should be canvassed:
- Can the same person be named in both jurisdictions? Are there practical/logistical/linguistic concerns that may lean toward naming a different person in the foreign jurisdiction?
- What events may cause an appointment to be revoked (eg., marriage, separation, bankruptcy)? If such rules differ between the jurisdictions, how will that be reconciled?
- What is the scope of the attorney’s activity for each of the jurisdictions? Where there is a gap, how will this be handled?
- If it is intended that the home jurisdiction attorney have ‘final say’, is this possible under the foreign jurisdiction’s rules? How can an attorney be removed?
- Is compensation allowed/required/prohibited, and do the planning documents together guard against double compensation?
- What checks are there to assure appropriate accounting and accountability for each attorney’s actions?
Cross-border developments
These concerns have been attracting greater interest in recent years, with two major developments worth noting.
In the summer of 2015, the Uniform Law Conference of Canada tentatively approved a uniform law on cross-border recognition of powers of attorney for both property and health care, health care instructions and similar documents. The Uniform Law Commission in the United States approved its draft in 2014. Provinces and states that incorporate the recommendations into their domestic law will enable their residents’ documents to be effective in all reciprocating jurisdictions.
In the area of estates, as of August 17, 2015, a new cross-border succession regulation is in force in the European Union (except Denmark, the U.K. and Ireland). It affects European citizens and residents, and European property held by non-residents. Canadians should consult with their lawyer whether any action is required on their part.