A Primer on FATCA – Tax compliance for Americans investing abroad

I was driving with a colleague in the Okanagan recently, cedars and hemlocks framing our view around each curve in the road.  As we reached the crest of a rise, we had a magnificent view back across the valley, seeing now the canopy of the forest where previously only the tree trunks could be distinguished during the winding trek.

That kind of trees-and-forest distinction came to mind this past January after thumbing through the just-released 543 pages of regulations under FATCA – the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – lacking the exhilaration of ‘magnificence’ however.  For those subject to US tax reporting, this is the cold new reality of holding investments abroad, with foreign financial institutions (FFIs) now obliged to report client accounts to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

If one doesn’t step back to get some perspective, there really is a risk of getting lost in the minutia.  Thus with as little jargon manageable and only a critical few acronyms among the dozens developing, here is an eagle-eye view of the FATCA forest.

Requirement and rationale

In tax parlance, ‘compliance’ basically means adequate information reporting to identify income sources, and of course payment of associated taxes.  In most tax systems, this is dependent to a large extent upon taxpayers self-reporting their income.  

For employment income, there are well-established systems of checks and balances that both compel and confirm compliance.  With respect to investment income, the variability of forms and fluidity of funds raise greater monitoring and quantification challenges for tax authorities.

FATCA is the latest information gathering tool the IRS will have at its disposal to facilitate US tax compliance.  It imposes greater reporting obligations upon US taxpayers holding investment accounts outside the US, and upon the institutions where those investments are held.

Subject to reporting?

As elsewhere, the United States levies tax on both domestic and foreign income.  However, whereas most jurisdictions only tax residents, the US also taxes its citizens wherever they may be.  

For most Canadian financial advisors, the clients affected by FATCA will be Canadian-resident US citizens, including individuals born in the US who have not renounced citizenship.  It also includes green card holders, corporations, estates, trusts, and possibly Canadian snowbirds (though this last group will likely be able to use the Canada-US treaty to be treated as solely Canadian).   

Using the term “US Reportable Account”, the net is cast very wide in terms of what is subject to reporting.  It includes savings, deposit, chequing and brokerage accounts, as well as investment funds, insurance contracts with cash surrender values, and annuity contracts.

The new reporting regime

The imminence of an increased degree of compliance has been discussed for many years, eventually culminating with the passage of FATCA within the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act in 2010.  With the publication of the January 2013 regulations, implementation is now in full swing.

Each country will need to negotiate an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the IRS in order for its FFIs not to be subject to 30% withholding tax on their US source payments and those of their clients.  A given IGA will either require an FFI to report to its own tax authority or to the IRS directly.  At time of writing, Canada’s IGA has not yet been completed. 

FFIs will have to begin reporting on new client/account openings beginning January 1, 2014, with reporting on existing accounts phased in through 2015.  The initial threshold account level demanding reporting is $50,000.  The FFI is required to annually report the holder’s name, address, US taxpayer information number (TIN), account number, and account balance at year-end (or at account closing if that applies).

At the self-reporting level

Non-resident US taxpayers are already required to file an annual tax return with the IRS, whether or not tax is due.  As well, where at least $10,000 is held in foreign financial accounts in a given year, there is an existing and continuing obligation to file Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).  The FBAR must be received by mail at the Department of the Treasury by June 30.

Under FATCA, US taxpayers who hold an aggregate of $50,000 in foreign accounts will be required to file a new Form 8938 Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets with their annual tax return.  (Non-residents should consult a tax professional to obtain advice whether they may be entitled to a higher threshold of $200,000 or more before being required to report.)  

While FBAR applies strictly to financial accounts held in foreign institutions, Form 8938 includes both foreign accounts and certain foreign non-account investment assets.  Some examples of the latter category would be a foreign retirement or deferred compensation plan, a partnership interest or an interest in a foreign estate.  

To reiterate, Form 8938 and FBAR are independent sets of rules, forms and departments.  Complying with one of these requirements does not automatically satisfy the other.  With hefty fines up to $10,000 or more and the potential for criminal sanctions, it is critical for affected US taxpayers to understand and comply.  

As clear as … ?

As we launch into the FATCA era, the one thing that is clear is that paperwork will increase and scrutiny will intensify.  And as a final proviso, this summary is not meant to be a complete overview of the compliance requirements, but rather to highlight the additional obligations introduced under FATCA.

For more information, straight from the primary source, consult the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Corporations/Foreign-Account-Tax-Compliance-Act-(FATCA). 

The latest state of the US Estate Tax

If there is one constant that can said about the US Estate Tax over the last decade, ironically it is that it is constantly in a state of change.

Since 2002 the threshold estate asset level to fall within the purview of the tax has been boosted, accompanied by an easing of the applicable rates.  The upshot has been a lessened likelihood of being subject to the tax, and lower expected cost.  Once again however, the spectre of greater exposure lies on the horizon, with the latest threshold and rate figures scheduled to go in the opposite direction on January 1, 2013.

For Canadians holding US situated property, it’s again time to sit up and take notice.

Scope of the tax

Generally the tax is applied to US citizens and residents, and to non-residents on their US situs property.  Fairly obviously it is applicable to real property, but also may apply to tangible personal property such as furniture and other fixtures accompanying or attached to real estate.  Intimate personal items such as clothing and jewelry will be less likely to be included, but the facts of a given situation could be ruled otherwise by the US Internal Revenue Service. 

In terms of investment assets, US pensions and shares of US corporations are caught, as are debt obligations of US corporations, of US citizens and of the US government (with some exceptions in this last respect).  This covers both registered and non-registered accounts, but would not extend to such securities held within Canadian mutual funds.  

2013 changes

American domestic law exempts $60,000 of a non-resident’s assets from being subject to the Estate Tax.  The Canada-US Treaty extends the exemption level for Canadian residents and citizens effectively up to the level to which Americans are entitled.  For a Canadian dying in 2012 with a worldwide estate of less than $5 million (as calculated under these rules), no tax would be due.  For estates above, remember that it is still only the US situs assets that are subject to the tax.

In 2013, the asset threshold is scheduled to drop to $1 million, with the upper reaches of the graduated bracket scale to again apply, up to the top rate of 55%.  

If this sounds like “déjà vu all over again” (thank you, Yogi Berra), on January 1, 2010 the $3.5 million threshold and 45% bracket were repealed pursuant to a 2001 enacted sunset provision.  The $1 million threshold and 55% top rate were scheduled to apply once more as of January 1, 2011, but this never happened due to a new law passed in December 2010 that retroactively set the asset level and top rate to $5 million and 35% respectively for 2010, and through to 2012.

If you got lost in that, just skip back one paragraph as a reminder that $1 million of worldwide assets will get a deceased Canadian into the club in 2013.  That’s assuming of course that there are no further adjustments following the US presidential election. 

Planning possibilities and priorities

As may be evident from this historical recap, one must be aware of this state of change, but tread carefully before planning against it.  Actions taken one year may turn out to be futile and/or unnecessary shortly thereafter, and costly in terms of transactional and professional fees to boot.

Still, those motivated to look further should consult both Canadian and US tax and legal counsel about ways they may be able to reduce the impact of the tax, including:

  • For those with shortened life expectancies, possibly selling property before death
  • Implications of lifetime gifting, particularly in light of the coordination of the US Estate Tax with the US Gift Tax, and the lack of coordination of this latter tax with Canadian foreign tax credits
  • Allowance and limits to claiming US Estate Tax as a foreign tax credit on a Canadian terminal tax return 
  • CRA’s revised position on corporate ownership of US real estate since 2005, grandfathering reminders for existing corporate ownership, and alternatives for holding title on newly-acquired US real estate