Skip to content

Doug Carroll

Tax, Estate & Financial Planning Advocate

  • About
  • MyTaxRef
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • doug@douglascarroll.ca

Tag: In-trust-account

In-trust accounts: Achieving tax efficiency with children’s savings

Known as in-trust, in-trust-for, or simply ITF, parents may often hold investment accounts earmarked for a minor child’s needs. While historically these trust accounts have been most commonly associated with education planning, they need not be constrained to that purpose alone. In particular, there are tax benefits that may be gained. 

However, to take effective advantage in this broader sense, greater formality is necessary. By carefully documenting and monitoring the arrangement, a family will be better able to calculate the tax benefits and obtain more certainty that those benefits will indeed be realized.

An informal trust?

Parents may view an ITF as an informal way to isolate savings, but there must truly be a trust relationship in order for the tax benefits to be realized. To paraphrase Yoda of Star Wars fame, a trust either “is or is not,” so the use of the term “informal trust” is something of a misnomer. Thus, it must be clear what the property is, who will benefit from that property, and that there is a discernible intention to transfer ownership of that property into this new relationship.

The principal benefit to be gained is to have as much of the income as possible taxed in the child’s low tax bracket. Absent the trust, all income will generally be taxed in the parent’s hands. With the trust in place

  • interest and dividends will still be attributed back and taxed to the parent, 
  • income-on-income (so-called second-generation income) will be taxed to the child, and 
  • realized capital gains will be taxed to the child.

Follow the money

It is important to understand that a taxpayer must be able to prove entitlement to a tax benefit, not for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to disprove it. Logistically, this presents some challenges when an ITF is employed.

In the classic ITF, all income is initially reported as that of the parent, being that it is that person’s Social Insurance Number that is on file with the investment company. In order to transfer taxation into the child’s hands, a note will have to be attached with the parent’s annual income tax return. In turn, a tax return should be filed on behalf of the child. Often there will be no tax due from the child given the basic personal exemption, but it is a good idea to nonetheless file the return to demonstrate you are in compliance with CRA filing rules.

Likewise, good recordkeeping is critical to being able to distinguish the types of income generated, in order to allocate the tax liability to the correct party. This can be especially complicated if the investment account is a combination of parent-sourced funds and the child’s own money, the latter being included because investment companies will not generally enter into contracts with minors. To the extent that these are commingled, it may become difficult – if not impossible as rebalancing and second-generation income come into play – to know what is whose, recalling once more that the onus is on the taxpayer vis-à-vis the CRA. 

It may be preferable to use at least two accounts, both of which will be ITFs in form, though in substance their source funds differ. The first account will be the child’s own money; for example, from the Canada Child Tax Benefit, the Universal Child Care Benefit or an inheritance. The ITF format is an administrative convenience, and all income of whatever sort is to be taxed to the child.

The second account will be the true trust arrangement whereby the parent-sourced funds are gifted from the parent to be invested for the child. The above-mentioned tax-filing procedure would apply to this account. Ideally, each year the second-generation income would be shuttled over to the first account, thereafter completely clear of being attributed back to the parent..

A role for corporate class

This is a situation where corporate class mutual funds may offer some value. Such funds do not distribute interest and foreign income, two of the income types that are subject to immediate attribution. Of the two types of income that are distributed, Canadian-eligible dividends will still be attributable (at first generation) to a parent under an ITF, but capital gains distributions will be taxed to the child.    

Author DougPosted on June 1, 2012December 30, 2019Categories Invesco FundamentalsTags In-trust-account, Mutual fund, Trust taxation

They grow up fast: Coordinating RESPs and ITFs

Back around Labour Day I was catching up with my brother’s family and asked my nephew about his university plans, this being his last year of high school.  

Apparently the little “Honours List-er” has decided on life sciences, a quick MD and a turn of PhD research – all slated for a series of universities a province or so over.

He and my brother laughed when I asked if he had some hidden trust account, but there was an almost perceptible alignment between my nephew’s shrug and my brother’s cringe when I followed with, “So how’s your RESP doing?”

In-trust accounts

In seriousness though, in the time before we had Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs), the classic in-trust-for (ITF) account was a common recommendation to parents and grandparents planning for such education costs. There was no legal limit on how much you could put into an ITF, which is still the case today.

The growth of such funds benefited – then as now – from strategically choosing investments that generate capital gains. As opposed to interest or dividends, these gains are taxable to the trust beneficiary, presumably at a lower tax bracket than those at older generations.

RESPs and CESGs

Of course, today the core of education savings is the RESP, which similarly enables a shift of taxation from contributor to plan beneficiary, and does so while tax sheltering growth in the interim.

When the 20% Basic Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG) is factored in, one would be hard-pressed to forego such an immediate return on contributing to an RESP. 

Where the twain shall meet

Let’s not turn our backs on the ITF too soon, however. Beyond the CESG threshold, an ITF remains a very good option to an RESP:

  • A well-managed ITF geared toward unrealized capital gains will experience similar tax-sheltered deferral
  • Both structures allow for the tax-free return of principal or contributions
  • On withdrawal, income is fully taxable under an RESP but only one-half taxable for an ITF that is then recognizing capital gains
  • Penalties result where a beneficiary does not attend a qualifying program under an RESP, but there are no such restrictions with an ITF and if desired the account can roll over at its cost base to the beneficiary without triggering as yet unrealized gains 

Perhaps none of this is much help to my brother at this stage, but it’s a good lesson for me personally as my own three little ones begin the trek.

Author DougPosted on September 1, 2010December 30, 2019Categories Invesco FundamentalsTags In-trust-account, Minor child, RESP, Schooling, Student

Where to invest that next dollar? Choosing among investment account types

Whether your clients retreated to cash during the recent economic turmoil or simply withheld further investment dollars, hopefully it won’t be long before they decide to get back into the market.

So where should that next investment dollar go?

Obviously you will follow your usual client risk profile and review existing asset allocation in assembling your recommendation to your client.  So that’s the “what”, but what about the “where”?

One of the most important decisions to be made about investments is the type of account into which a security or portfolio is placed and held.  While a broad range of issues should be reviewed in deciding among accounts, here are some key tax considerations to inform that process. 

Of course any analysis will depend on the purpose for which the investor is saving.  For a more in-depth review of relevant issues, we have developed two tools to assist in this analysis:

Our Investment Account Type Comparison InfoCard – An expansion of the above grid into over two dozen tax, legal and estate considerations

Our Investment Account Type Comparison InfoPage – A narrative of the core features of each account type, including a review of the most common head-to-head comparisons

And don’t forget our Tax and Estate InfoService if you have further questions, or are just looking for a sounding board for your analysis.

Author DougPosted on November 1, 2009December 30, 2019Categories Invesco FundamentalsTags In-trust-account, Investing, RESP, RRSP/RRIF, TFSA

Search this site

Recent Posts

  • Baby bump – EI assistance for expecting parents
  • ‘No charge’ for mom – Are you insure about that?
  • Insurance and your child
  • Caution when considering a HELOC to supplement living expenses
  • Business and life insurance
  • iTIPS* – Income continuity
  • iTIPS* – Corporate insured annuity
  • iTIPS* – Corporate estate bond
  • iTIPS* – Key person protection
  • iTIPS* – Buy-sell funding
  • iTIPS* – Insured annuity
  • iTIPS* – Cascading cash value
  • iTIPS* – Capital gains protector
  • TFSA room indexing – Anticipating the acceleration
  • CPP premium increases through 2025
  • IPP suitability scorecard – Business owners and professionals
  • Homebuyer tax breaks
  • Spousal rollover … or not?
  • Money for your matrimony
  • RRSP-TFSA concepts & coordination

By publication

  • Advisor's Edge / advisor.ca (83)
  • Advocis Forum (39)
  • AvisoWealth (96)
  • Blogosphere (18)
  • Empire Life Initiative (7)
  • GlobalTV MoneyWise (13)
  • Insurance Journal (67)
  • Invesco Fundamentals (88)
  • LinkedIn (8)
  • Meridian GoodSense (16)

Archives

Tags

  • Advisor (25)
  • Beneficiary (9)
  • BookSale (9)
  • Capital gains (9)
  • Charity (11)
  • Corporation (15)
  • Cottage (9)
  • CPP (16)
  • CRA (18)
  • Credit/debt (13)
  • Deduction (18)
  • Disability (9)
  • Dividend (10)
  • Donation (13)
  • Employment (12)
  • Estate (13)
  • Executor (7)
  • Family (21)
  • Fees (8)
  • Foreign (8)
  • Home (9)
  • Insurance (31)
  • Investing (24)
  • iTIPS (8)
  • Mutual fund (9)
  • Named beneficiary (9)
  • OAS (7)
  • Pension (10)
  • RESP (14)
  • Retirement (22)
  • RRSP/RRIF (49)
  • Saving (14)
  • Schooling (11)
  • Small business (18)
  • Spouse (20)
  • Succession (12)
  • Tax (9)
  • Tax credit (11)
  • Tax filing (21)
  • Tax rates (10)
  • Tax shelter (11)
  • TFSA (27)
  • Trust (24)
  • USA (9)
  • Will (16)
  • About
  • MyTaxRef
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • doug@douglascarroll.ca
Doug Carroll Proudly powered by WordPress