Thanks for the memories – Transferring the family cottage

I met my wife on the May long weekend about a decade ago, on the beach of the cottage that had been my summer home since I was a child.  It was the last – and most lasting – memory of about three decades our family had been there.  Earlier that spring we had decided among us that it was time to move on, and a week later my parents closed the sale to another young family.

For many though, the preferred route is to pass a cottage, cabin or chalet on to the next generation.  With the view from this year’s May long weekend toward summer on the horizon, here are some tax and legal issues to contemplate as a family looks down that road.

From one generation …

A transfer to anyone other than a spouse will trigger capital gains, including a proportionate deemed disposition if a non-spouse is added as a joint owner.  Per the usual calculation, fair market value less adjusted cost base yields the capital gain, half of which is included in the transferor’s taxable income.  Be aware that as this is generally personal use property under tax law, one cannot claim a capital loss if the figure is negative. 

The starting point for ACB will be the initial outlay to acquire the property, plus any capital improvements.  This may also have been bumped by up to $100,000 if steps were taken prior to March, 1994 to preserve the then-eliminated general capital gains exemption.  As with all tax reporting, good recordkeeping is essential.

To counter this tax, quite often the property can qualify for the principal residence exemption.  But bear in mind that the later availability of the exemption will be reduced or eliminated for overlapping years of ownership of other properties held by either spouse, so proceed cautiously.

The spectre of a hefty capital gains tax bill may lead some to delay transfer until the last death of the two parents.  Assuming this is a conscious plan, a sinking fund or joint-last-to-die life insurance policy might be arranged to pay the tax.  On the other hand, if this is the result of procrastination, it could merely guarantee the inevitable sale of the property if the estate has insufficient cash for the purpose.  

While such a delay may defer capital gains related tax, in some provinces the involvement of the estate will attract significant probate tax.  An alternative that may bypass probate and still delay capital gains tax may be to add an adult child as a joint owner while the parents are living, but with the beneficial joint entitlement only passing upon the last parent’s death.  This planning possibility arises out of the Supreme Court’s Pecore decision in 2007, and should be discussed with a lawyer to determine its possible application in an actual family situation.

… to another 

On the receiving end, there are relatively few tax complications where the property is transferred to a single child.  However, where there are multiple children and especially multiple generations involved, things can become challenging.

Joint ownership among siblings (or any non-spouses for that matter), can be messy in two major respects.  First, right of survivorship means that on a sibling’s later death, his/her interest passes to the surviving joint owners, whereas the more likely intention might have been for that interest (or at least the value) to fall to the deceased’s descendants.  Second, the now-deceased sibling’s estate could have a capital gains tax liability, in a sense adding insult to injury since the joint property interest will have passed to the surviving siblings.

An alternative to joint ownership would be to have siblings hold their interests as tenants-in-common, with the result that a deceased’s interest falls into his/her estate.  The drawback here is that it puts probate tax back on the table, not to mention the potential exponential increase in owners as the next generation comes on.

A more flexible alternative may be to establish a trust, of which the family members are beneficiaries.  This could either be an inter vivos trust the parents establish presently, or one or more testamentary trusts created out of their Wills.  Either way, it would be advisable to have a maintenance fund within the trust to facilitate general upkeep as well as capital expenses.

Some further factors that will influence the decision include: if, when and to what extent land transfer tax may apply; whether anyone has creditor concerns; how matrimonial law may apply; and additional complications associated with foreign properties, particularly exposure to US estate tax on properties south of the 49th parallel.    

Of course, this is not exclusively a tax and legal decision, but rather one that can have high emotional stakes.  So if there is already a battle over who gets access when, it may be better to just erect the ‘for sale’ sign and keep the memories intact.

EstateWISE – Joint ownership of the cottage with adult children?

Joint ownership is a common ownership arrangement that assures that a property remains within an ownership group, like a family — but what are the drawbacks when a cottage is owned this way?

Can we re-cap how joint ownership works for estate planning purposes?

  • Under joint ownership, when one joint owner dies, the surviving joint owners continue on as owners and the deceased owner has no further claim on the property
  • For estate planning purposes then, joint ownership provides the benefit of allowing the cottage to devolve outside of the estate, and thereby avoid probate tax

So, let’s say mom and dad want to add their adult son as a joint owner, what happens?

  • Whenever there is a change of ownership, there is a disposition for tax purposes
  • In this case, mom and dad will be deemed to dispose of a proportionate one-third interest in the cottage to son, and they will have to pay tax on that portion of the gain since the last disposition

So now that son is a joint owner, has our family ‘paid all their dues’ or is there more to come?

  • Unfortunately, as each death occurs there will be a disposition of a proportionate interest in the property, and tax will have to be paid by the deceased’s estate
  • Had things been left alone, it would only be upon the second death of mom and dad that capital gains tax would have been payable
  • It’s not necessarily a matter of paying more tax, but rather paying it sooner than otherwise required 

Other than this tax complication, is this a sound estate planning strategy?

  • If it was a last surviving parent adding on an only child late in life (perhaps nearing death), then this step may simplify the ultimate estate distribution, and any immediate tax consequences are of little concern because they would be coming up shortly anyway
  • Primarily you will be avoiding probate tax, but there are other legal issues to consider … 
    • There are legal fees and government filing charges to be paid each time there is a change
    • If the son uses the cottage as a matrimonial home with his spouse then has a marriage breakdown, his interest in the cottage may be included in determining any equalization payment
    • If the son has creditor problems, there could potentially be a forced sale of the property
    • Finally, if the son dies before the last parent then property will revert back to the parent, and all the out-of-pocket costs and pre-paid taxes will be for naught
  • These are the most common concerns, but there can be other issues depending on the personal circumstances — the bottom line is to get professional advice in order to make an informed decision

EstateWISE – Joint ownership

We often hear of a couple owning their home “jointly”, but what does that really mean, and is it always the best way for people to own property?

What are the usual alternatives for groups of people to own property?

  • Two common forms: Joint ownership and Ownership-in-common
  • Under joint ownership, 
    • Members of the ownership group hold an undivided equal interest in the entire property
    • Generally owners cannot sell or transfer their interests without the agreement of all others
    • At a death, continuing ownership flows to the living owners by ‘right-of-survivorship’ 
  • Under ownership-in-common
    • You could have equal or unequal ownership proportions
    • Interests may be transferable as of right,  though owners could agree otherwise beforehand
    • At a death, the deceased’s interest falls into his/her estate to be governed by his/her Will

So why would couples prefer to use joint ownership for their homes?

  • It simplifies the estate administration process because you don’t have to refer to a Will (or resort to an intestacy application), or usually be worried about a challenge from a would-be estate beneficiary
  • Because it passes outside the estate, it is not subject to probate taxes, and usually it will also be outside the reach of any estate creditors

In comparison then, when might ownership-in-common be the mode of choice?

  • Where business partners own rental property, they will normally want those business interests to go to their own spouses and families
  • Those in second marriages may want to assure that their property remains along blood lines 
  • And even for first marriage spouses with substantial wealth, there may be tax planning reasons for using common ownership as part of a broader estate plan

Does this discussion only apply to real estate?

  • Real estate is the most often discussed type of property, but in principle any property can be owned by more than one person, and these are the two ways that it is most often carried out
  • Of course, for real estate and financial accounts, there are formal records of ownership, but for other properties you need to be careful how you keep your own records so you can prove the arrangement in future if called to do so