If there is one constant that can said about the US Estate Tax over the last decade, ironically it is that it is constantly in a state of change.
Since 2002 the threshold estate asset level to fall within the purview of the tax has been boosted, accompanied by an easing of the applicable rates. The upshot has been a lessened likelihood of being subject to the tax, and lower expected cost. Once again however, the spectre of greater exposure lies on the horizon, with the latest threshold and rate figures scheduled to go in the opposite direction on January 1, 2013.
For Canadians holding US situated property, it’s again time to sit up and take notice.
Scope of the tax
Generally the tax is applied to US citizens and residents, and to non-residents on their US situs property. Fairly obviously it is applicable to real property, but also may apply to tangible personal property such as furniture and other fixtures accompanying or attached to real estate. Intimate personal items such as clothing and jewelry will be less likely to be included, but the facts of a given situation could be ruled otherwise by the US Internal Revenue Service.
In terms of investment assets, US pensions and shares of US corporations are caught, as are debt obligations of US corporations, of US citizens and of the US government (with some exceptions in this last respect). This covers both registered and non-registered accounts, but would not extend to such securities held within Canadian mutual funds.
2013 changes
American domestic law exempts $60,000 of a non-resident’s assets from being subject to the Estate Tax. The Canada-US Treaty extends the exemption level for Canadian residents and citizens effectively up to the level to which Americans are entitled. For a Canadian dying in 2012 with a worldwide estate of less than $5 million (as calculated under these rules), no tax would be due. For estates above, remember that it is still only the US situs assets that are subject to the tax.
In 2013, the asset threshold is scheduled to drop to $1 million, with the upper reaches of the graduated bracket scale to again apply, up to the top rate of 55%.
If this sounds like “déjà vu all over again” (thank you, Yogi Berra), on January 1, 2010 the $3.5 million threshold and 45% bracket were repealed pursuant to a 2001 enacted sunset provision. The $1 million threshold and 55% top rate were scheduled to apply once more as of January 1, 2011, but this never happened due to a new law passed in December 2010 that retroactively set the asset level and top rate to $5 million and 35% respectively for 2010, and through to 2012.
If you got lost in that, just skip back one paragraph as a reminder that $1 million of worldwide assets will get a deceased Canadian into the club in 2013. That’s assuming of course that there are no further adjustments following the US presidential election.
Planning possibilities and priorities
As may be evident from this historical recap, one must be aware of this state of change, but tread carefully before planning against it. Actions taken one year may turn out to be futile and/or unnecessary shortly thereafter, and costly in terms of transactional and professional fees to boot.
Still, those motivated to look further should consult both Canadian and US tax and legal counsel about ways they may be able to reduce the impact of the tax, including:
- For those with shortened life expectancies, possibly selling property before death
- Implications of lifetime gifting, particularly in light of the coordination of the US Estate Tax with the US Gift Tax, and the lack of coordination of this latter tax with Canadian foreign tax credits
- Allowance and limits to claiming US Estate Tax as a foreign tax credit on a Canadian terminal tax return
- CRA’s revised position on corporate ownership of US real estate since 2005, grandfathering reminders for existing corporate ownership, and alternatives for holding title on newly-acquired US real estate